[Response to Nathan] -- The science in medical writing

Welcome to the newly redesigned Science Careers Forum. Please bookmark this site now for future reference. If you've previously posted to the forum, your current username and password will remain the same in the new system. If you've never posted or are new to the forum, you will need to create a new account.

The new forum is designed with some features to improve the user experience. Upgrades include:
- easy-to-read, threaded discussions
- ability to follow discussions and receive notifications of updates
- private messaging to other SC Forum members
- fully searchable database of posts
- ability to quote in your response
- basic HTML formatting available

Moderator: Dave Jensen
Advisors:   Ana, PG, Rich Lemert, Dick Woodward, Dave Walker
Meet the Moderator/Advisors

[Response to Nathan] -- The science in medical writing

Postby MPB » Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:28 pm

Nathan asked me a question in another thread about the degree of science in medical writing jobs.

The scientific complexity of medical writing jobs in a medical communications company really varies a lot. You are usually writing education programs for physicians, or sometimes for pharmacists or nurses. So the focus is really clinical -- mechanism of action, efficacy, tolerability, safety, how the agent compares with other medications for the same indication. It helps to have a good grasp of physiology and statistics. When there is a lot of science involved, you are usually trying to explain to physicians as simply as possible how some new drug works. There are really not that many radically new drug mechanisms -- new ones tend to tinker with mechanisms or delivery systems that are already well established. The main challenge is that you have to be able to absorb a lot of information about a completely unfamiliar topic in a short period of time and then write or speak about it accurately and with authority. One day you may be working on arthritis, and the next day you may be asked to write a detailed proposal on Sjogren\'s syndrome or Crohn disease. You also have to know something about the marketing positions of the various competing products in the same marketplace. I see a lot of PhDs move into these jobs and not do well in them because they have spent their entire careers thinking about one little pathway, and it\'s hard to be able to think flexibly about anything that comes your way. Understanding the science of your various therapeutic areas is important but I would say that that is about 10% of the overall job of a medical writer.

There is a ton of med-ed stuff on the internet. If you search for \"educational grant\" + [name of disease] you will find a lot of programs. You might take a look at some and see what they entail.

Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:28 pm

Return to Science Careers Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: David Lathbury and 16 guests