Subscribe

Forum

CV for first post-doc hunting!

Welcome to the newly redesigned Science Careers Forum. Please bookmark this site now for future reference. If you've previously posted to the forum, your current username and password will remain the same in the new system. If you've never posted or are new to the forum, you will need to create a new account.

The new forum is designed with some features to improve the user experience. Upgrades include:
- easy-to-read, threaded discussions
- ability to follow discussions and receive notifications of updates
- private messaging to other SC Forum members
- fully searchable database of posts
- ability to quote in your response
- basic HTML formatting available

Moderator: Dave Jensen
Advisors:   Ana, PG, Rich Lemert, Dick Woodward, Dave Walker
Meet the Moderator/Advisors

CV for first post-doc hunting!

Postby SV » Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:56 pm

Hey All,

Sure, my topic is stale. But, hey, I was never this concerned about my next move when my peers were hunting! My question is...can anyone suggest a website or an article...even better an exemplar...on how to write a CV for first post-doctoral position? FYI, I have more degrees (have one doctorate already, but in a different field!) and minimal 'work' experience! Any suggestions?

Thanks,
SV
SV
 

CV for first post-doc hunting!

Postby Jim Austin » Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:17 pm

SV,

Not stale at all. Good question. The answer is easy to understand but difficult to execute. In a sense a CV is the "anti-resume". Whereas a resume should be slick and concise, a CV is expected to be encyclopedic. I'm not sure, but I sometimes wonder if in giving out scientific awards they just weigh the things instead of reading them.

Your CV should be neat, reasonably concise, and correct. But it should include every professional thing you've ever done: every degree (of course); every publication you've ever been author or co-author on (of course)...but also every meeting you've ever presented at, every published conference proceeding whether it was peer reviewed or not; every committee you've ever served on; every award you've ever won; every presentation you've ever given, invited or otherwise; every fellowship you've ever won; every grant you've ever received or participated in; every short course you've ever attended; every course you've ever taught; every remotely-science-related job you've ever held; every professional society you belong to; every position of responsibility you've ever held within a relevant organization (eg, treasure of the grad student association).

Also include a section on specific skills: programming languages, analytical assays, whatever.

Generally, education comes first, then work experience. After that there's some choice. I put honors and awards next, followed by specific skills, followed by presentations and then publications. Presentations and publications come towards the end not because they aren't important, but because they tend to be long lists, especially for more experienced scientists.
As I wrote, your CV should be correct, but it doesn't need to be slick. Use decent paper (not the brownish recycled stuff) but don't spend the money on heavy ultra-white cotton bond. It ought to be white, though: no chartreuse CVs. Check the spelling and the grammar (where appropriate), but don't mess around with fancy fonts.

If you're starting from scratch, you may have a lot of work ahead of you. Once you've got your CV in order, keep it handy and update it often. It's great if you can get in the habit of adding stuff to it as soon as it happens.

Best of luck.

Jim Austin
Jim Austin
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:28 pm


Return to Science Careers Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Michael, Teresa and 15 guests