Is being a CRA a good way to break into regulatory?

Welcome to the newly redesigned Science Careers Forum. Please bookmark this site now for future reference. If you've previously posted to the forum, your current username and password will remain the same in the new system. If you've never posted or are new to the forum, you will need to create a new account.

The new forum is designed with some features to improve the user experience. Upgrades include:
- easy-to-read, threaded discussions
- ability to follow discussions and receive notifications of updates
- private messaging to other SC Forum members
- fully searchable database of posts
- ability to quote in your response
- basic HTML formatting available

Moderator: Dave Jensen
Advisors:   Ana, PG, Rich Lemert, Dick Woodward, Dave Walker
Meet the Moderator/Advisors

Is being a CRA a good way to break into regulatory?

Postby Kim » Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:29 pm

What do you think of using a CRA position as a stepping stone to regulatory affairs?

I've recently taken a position providing career resources for grad students and postdocs in the biomedical sciences at a Research I university. I have a soon-to-defend Pharmacology student who is burned out and uninterested in a post-doc. After some reading, she's very interested in regulatory affairs. Unfortunately, our region is not a hotbed of biotech companies, and she's unable to relocate at this time for personal reasons. We do, however, have two large CROs in town that employ a lot of entry-level CRAs.

Since regulatory is notoriously difficult to break into, and she's tied to this area for at least another two years, should she consider pursuing a CRA position in order to get some industry experience and regulatory exposure? Or will that be looked upon unfavorably down the line when she is able to relocate?

Many thanks for your thoughts-

Return to Science Careers Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests